The Free Will Theodicy (FWT) attempts to defeat the Argument from
Evil by claiming that the suffering of the innocent (SOI) is justified
by the existence
of free will (FW). I argue against the FWT by demonstrating that there
are at least
three logically possible worlds, one without FW and two with it, such that,
if given
a choice, all conscious beings would act rationally in choosing to live
in any of those
three worlds rather than in the current world. This choice outcome undermines
the
FWT's contention that FW adequately justifies the quantity and severity
of the SOI
in this world.